Mechanism Design under Approximate Incentive Compatibility
Santiago Balseiro, Omar Besbes, Francisco Castro

TL;DR
This paper investigates how approximate incentive compatibility affects revenue in mechanism design, revealing that revenue gains depend on the local curvature of the revenue function and introducing randomized mechanisms to optimize outcomes.
Contribution
It provides the first parametric bounds linking revenue gains to the revenue function's curvature under approximate IC and designs randomized mechanisms for optimal revenue.
Findings
Revenue gains depend on the local curvature of the revenue function.
Optimal mechanisms must incorporate randomization when approximate IC is allowed.
The paper establishes tight bounds on revenue improvements under approximate incentive constraints.
Abstract
A fundamental assumption in classical mechanism design is that buyers are perfect optimizers. However, in practice, buyers may be limited by their computational capabilities or a lack of information, and may not be able to perfectly optimize. This has motivated the introduction of approximate incentive compatibility (IC) as an appealing solution concept for practical mechanism design. While most of the literature focuses on the analysis of particular approximate IC mechanisms, this paper is the first to study the design of optimal mechanisms in the space of approximate IC mechanisms and to explore how much revenue can be garnered by moving from exact to approximate incentive constraints. We study the problem of a seller facing one buyer with private values and analyze optimal selling mechanisms under -incentive compatibility. We establish that the gains that can be garnered…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
