Flow over an espresso cup: Inferring 3D velocity and pressure fields from tomographic background oriented schlieren videos via physics-informed neural networks
Shengze Cai, Zhicheng Wang, Frederik Fuest, Young-Jin Jeon, and Callum Gray, George Em Karniadakis

TL;DR
This paper introduces a physics-informed neural network approach to infer 3D velocity and pressure fields from Tomo-BOS imaging data, enabling detailed flow analysis with limited experimental measurements.
Contribution
The study presents a novel PINN-based method to accurately infer 3D flow fields from Tomo-BOS data, integrating physics constraints for improved fluid dynamics analysis.
Findings
Successfully inferred instantaneous velocity and pressure fields over an espresso cup.
Validated PINN results with independent PIV measurements.
Demonstrated robustness across different flow regimes with varied Reynolds and Richardson numbers.
Abstract
Tomographic background oriented schlieren (Tomo-BOS) imaging measures density or temperature fields in 3D using multiple camera BOS projections, and is particularly useful for instantaneous flow visualizations of complex fluid dynamics problems. We propose a new method based on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to infer the full continuous 3D velocity and pressure fields from snapshots of 3D temperature fields obtained by Tomo-BOS imaging. PINNs seamlessly integrate the underlying physics of the observed fluid flow and the visualization data, hence enabling the inference of latent quantities using limited experimental data. In this hidden fluid mechanics paradigm, we train the neural network by minimizing a loss function composed of a data mismatch term and residual terms associated with the coupled Navier-Stokes and heat transfer equations. We first quantify the accuracy of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
