TL;DR
This paper introduces a new family of information measures called volume mutual information and develops practical mechanisms for multi-task peer prediction that work with a finite number of tasks, improving upon previous methods.
Contribution
It proposes VMI-Mechanisms based on volume mutual information, extending the DMI-Mechanism to be more practical and approximately optimal with finite tasks.
Findings
VMI-Mechanisms are practical and approximately optimal.
Volume mutual information provides a geometric interpretation of information.
DMI-Mechanism may not be optimal, but VMI-Mechanisms can improve performance.
Abstract
In the setting where we ask participants multiple similar possibly subjective multi-choice questions (e.g. Do you like Bulbasaur? Y/N; do you like Squirtle? Y/N), peer prediction aims to design mechanisms that encourage honest feedback without verification. A series of works have successfully designed multi-task peer prediction mechanisms where reporting truthfully is better than any other strategy (dominantly truthful), while they require an infinite number of tasks. A recent work proposes the first multi-task peer prediction mechanism, Determinant Mutual Information (DMI)-Mechanism, where not only is dominantly truthful but also works for a finite number of tasks (practical). However, the existence of other practical dominantly-truthful multi-task peer prediction mechanisms remains to be an open question. This work answers the above question by providing 1. a new family of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
More Dominantly Truthful Multi-task Peer Prediction with a Finite Number of Tasks· youtube
