Sibyl: Understanding and Addressing the Usability Challenges of Machine Learning In High-Stakes Decision Making
Alexandra Zytek, Dongyu Liu, Rhema Vaithianathan, and Kalyan, Veeramachaneni

TL;DR
This paper introduces Sibyl, a visual analytics tool designed to improve the interpretability and usability of machine learning models in high-stakes child welfare screening, addressing trust and ethical challenges faced by domain experts.
Contribution
The paper presents the development and evaluation of Sibyl, a novel visualization tool that enhances understanding of ML predictions for non-expert users in high-stakes decision-making.
Findings
Sibyl increased interpretability for child welfare screeners.
User studies showed improved trust and decision quality.
Provided design guidelines for domain-specific ML visualization tools.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is being applied to a diverse and ever-growing set of domains. In many cases, domain experts - who often have no expertise in ML or data science - are asked to use ML predictions to make high-stakes decisions. Multiple ML usability challenges can appear as result, such as lack of user trust in the model, inability to reconcile human-ML disagreement, and ethical concerns about oversimplification of complex problems to a single algorithm output. In this paper, we investigate the ML usability challenges that present in the domain of child welfare screening through a series of collaborations with child welfare screeners. Following the iterative design process between the ML scientists, visualization researchers, and domain experts (child screeners), we first identified four key ML challenges and honed in on one promising explainable ML technique to address them (local…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
