Multiple imputation with missing data indicators
Lauren J Beesley, Irina Bondarenko, Michael R Elliott, Allison W, Kurian, Steven J Katz, and Jeremy M G Taylor

TL;DR
This paper extends sequential regression multiple imputation (SRMI) to handle not-at-random missing data by incorporating missingness indicators and interactions, reducing bias in analyses.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized SRMI method for MNAR data, with algebraic justification and simulation validation, improving bias correction.
Findings
Modified SRMI reduces bias compared to standard SRMI
Including missingness indicators improves imputation accuracy
Offset inclusion in models performs best overall
Abstract
Multiple imputation is a well-established general technique for analyzing data with missing values. A convenient way to implement multiple imputation is sequential regression multiple imputation (SRMI), also called chained equations multiple imputation. In this approach, we impute missing values using regression models for each variable, conditional on the other variables in the data. This approach, however, assumes that the missingness mechanism is missing at random, and it is not well-justified under not-at-random missingness without additional modification. In this paper, we describe how we can generalize the SRMI imputation procedure to handle not-at-random missingness (MNAR) in the setting where missingness may depend on other variables that are also missing. We provide algebraic justification for several generalizations of standard SRMI using Taylor series and other approximations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
