Sustaining Research Software via Research Software Engineers and Professional Associations
Jeffrey C. Carver, Ian A. Cosden, Chris Hill, Sandra Gesing, and Daniel S. Katz

TL;DR
This paper discusses how professional associations like US-RSE support Research Software Engineers by providing resources and advocacy to address unique sustainability challenges in research software development.
Contribution
It highlights the role of professional associations in supporting RSEs and sustaining research software, an area with limited prior focus.
Findings
Professional associations offer critical support and resources for RSEs.
Support from associations enhances the sustainability of research software.
RSEs face unique challenges that differ from traditional software developers.
Abstract
Research software is a class of software developed to support research. Today a wealth of such software is created daily in universities, government, and commercial research enterprises worldwide. The sustainability of this software faces particular challenges due, at least in part, to the type of people who develop it. These Research Software Engineers (RSEs) face challenges in developing and sustaining software that differ from those faced by the developers of traditional software. As a result, professional associations have begun to provide support, advocacy, and resources for RSEs. These benefits are critical to sustaining RSEs, especially in environments where their contributions are often undervalued and not rewarded. This paper focuses on how professional associations, such as the United States Research Software Engineer Association (US-RSE), can provide this.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
