COVID-19 vs Social Media Apps: Does Privacy Really Matter?
Omar Haggag, Sherif Haggag, John Grundy, Mohamed Abdelrazek

TL;DR
This study compares privacy concerns and user perceptions of COVID-19 contact tracing apps versus social media apps, revealing that social media apps have higher privacy issues but are used more, while COVID-19 apps are less accessible and trusted.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of privacy policies, user reviews, and app features, highlighting misconceptions and areas for improvement in COVID-19 app adoption.
Findings
Social media apps have higher privacy and ethical issues than COVID-19 apps.
Users perceive COVID-19 apps as more secure than social media apps.
COVID-19 apps are less accessible and stable, affecting user trust and retention.
Abstract
Many people around the world are worried about using or even downloading COVID-19 contact tracing mobile apps. The main reported concerns are centered around privacy and ethical issues. At the same time, people are voluntarily using Social Media apps at a significantly higher rate during the pandemic without similar privacy concerns compared with COVID-19 apps. To better understand these seemingly anomalous behaviours, we analysed the privacy policies, terms & conditions and data use agreements of the most commonly used COVID-19, Social Media & Productivity apps. We also developed a tool to extract and analyse nearly 2 million user reviews for these apps. Our results show that Social Media & Productivity apps actually have substantially higher privacy and ethical issues compared with the majority of COVID-19 apps. Surprisingly, lots of people indicated in their user reviews that they…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
