Graph Information Vanishing Phenomenon inImplicit Graph Neural Networks

TL;DR

This paper investigates the Graph Information Vanishing phenomenon in implicit GNNs, revealing that learnable transformation structures often diminish the usefulness of graph information during node representation learning.

Contribution

The study identifies the GIV phenomenon in implicit GNNs and demonstrates that current methods fail to effectively utilize graph information, suggesting a need to rethink the relationship between graph data and transformation structures.

Findings

Randomization of graph info rarely affects model performance

LTS maps different graph info into highly similar outputs

GIV phenomenon is supported by extensive experiments

Abstract

One of the key problems of GNNs is how to describe the importance of neighbor nodes in the aggregation process for learning node representations. A class of GNNs solves this problem by learning implicit weights to represent the importance of neighbor nodes, which we call implicit GNNs such as Graph Attention Network. The basic idea of implicit GNNs is to introduce graph information with special properties followed by Learnable Transformation Structures (LTS) which encode the importance of neighbor nodes via a data-driven way. In this paper, we argue that LTS makes the special properties of graph information disappear during the learning process, resulting in graph information unhelpful for learning node representations. We call this phenomenon Graph Information Vanishing (GIV). Also, we find that LTS maps different graph information into highly similar results. To validate the above two points, we design two sets of 70 random experiments on five Implicit GNNs methods and seven benchmark datasets by using a random permutation operator to randomly disrupt the order of graph information and replacing graph information with random values. We find that randomization does not affect the model performance in 93\% of the cases, with about 7 percentage causing an average 0.5\% accuracy loss. And the cosine similarity of output results, generated by LTS mapping different graph information, over 99\% with an 81\% proportion. The experimental results provide evidence to support the existence of GIV in Implicit GNNs and imply that the existing methods of Implicit GNNs do not make good use of graph information. The relationship between graph information and LTS should be rethought to ensure that graph information is used in node representation.