TL;DR
This review discusses the Hubble tension, highlighting recent measurements and theoretical solutions like early dark energy, neutrino interactions, and modified gravity, aiming to reconcile discrepancies in Hubble constant estimates.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of proposed solutions to the Hubble tension, evaluating their effectiveness and compatibility with current data.
Findings
Some models improve data fit within 1-2 sigma
No single solution is definitively favored
Multiple physics scenarios remain plausible
Abstract
The CDM model provides a good fit to a large span of cosmological data but harbors areas of phenomenology. With the improvement of the number and the accuracy of observations, discrepancies among key cosmological parameters of the model have emerged. The most statistically significant tension is the disagreement between predictions of the Hubble constant by early time probes with CDM model, and a number of late time, model-independent determinations of from local measurements of distances and redshifts. The high precision and consistency of the data at both ends present strong challenges to the possible solution space and demand a hypothesis with enough rigor to explain multiple observations--whether these invoke new physics, unexpected large-scale structures or multiple, unrelated errors. We present a thorough review of the problem, including a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
