Entropy collapse versus entropy rigidity for Reeb and Finsler flows
Alberto Abbondandolo, Marcelo R.R. Alves, Murat Saglam, and Felix, Schlenk

TL;DR
This paper compares the behavior of Reeb flows and Finsler geodesic flows on closed manifolds, showing that Reeb flows can have arbitrarily small entropy while Finsler flows have a positive lower bound.
Contribution
It demonstrates a fundamental difference in entropy properties between Reeb flows and Finsler geodesic flows on closed manifolds.
Findings
Reeb flows can have arbitrarily small topological entropy.
Finsler geodesic flows have a positive lower bound for entropy on many manifolds.
The results highlight contrasting entropy rigidity and collapse phenomena.
Abstract
On every closed contact manifold there exist contact forms with volume one whose Reeb flows have arbitrarily small topological entropy. In contrast, for many closed manifolds there is a uniform positive lower bound for the topological entropy of (not necessarily reversible) normalized Finsler geodesic flows.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Differential Geometry Research · Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
