Absence of magnetic evidence for superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure
J.E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio

TL;DR
This paper questions the magnetic evidence for superconductivity in high-pressure hydrides, especially sulfur hydride, arguing that the observed magnetic behavior does not support superconductivity claims and challenging the prevailing consensus.
Contribution
It critically re-evaluates magnetic measurement data on sulfur hydride and other hydrides, providing alternative explanations and questioning the evidence for high-temperature superconductivity in these materials.
Findings
Magnetic susceptibility shows a paramagnetic contribution below Tc.
Temperature dependence suggests the paramagnetism originates from the sample.
Published magnetic data do not strongly support superconductivity in hydrides.
Abstract
It is generally believed that magnetization measurements on sulfur hydride under high pressure performed in 2015 [1] provided "final convincing evidence of superconductivity" [2] in that material, in agreement with theoretical predictions [3,4]. Supported by this precedent, drops in resistance that were later observed in several other hydrides under high pressure [2,5] have been generally accepted as evidence of superconductivity without corroborating evidence from magnetic measurements. In this paper we challenge the original interpretation that the magnetic measurements on sulfur hydride performed in 2015 were evidence of superconductivity. We point out that a large paramagnetic contribution to the magnetic susceptibility was detected below Tc and argue that its temperature dependence rules out the possibility that it would be a background signal; instead the temperature dependence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
