Hawking-Ellis classification of stress-energy: test-fields versus back-reaction
Prado Martin-Moruno (Complutense de Madrid), Matt Visser (Victoria, University of Wellington)

TL;DR
This paper examines the Hawking-Ellis classification of stress-energy tensors, contrasting test-field scenarios with those including back-reaction, revealing that back-reaction often constrains stress-energy to type I in many physically relevant spacetimes.
Contribution
It demonstrates that back-reaction governed by Einstein equations restricts stress-energy types to type I in many important spacetime configurations, unlike test-field cases which can produce type IV.
Findings
Test fields can produce type IV stress-energy tensors.
Back-reaction constrains stress-energy to type I in static and stationary spacetimes.
Type I stress-energy is guaranteed in many cosmological models.
Abstract
We consider the Hawking-Ellis (Segre-Plebanski) classification of stress-energy tensors, both in the test-field limit, and in the presence of back-reaction governed by the usual Einstein equations. For test fields it is not too difficult to get a type~IV stress-energy via quantum vacuum polarization effects. (For example, consider the Unruh quantum vacuum state for a massless scalar field in the Schwarzschild background.) However, in the presence of back-reaction driven by the ordinary Einstein equations the situation is often much more constrained. For instance: (1) in any static spacetime the stress-energy is always type I in the domain of outer communication, and on any horizon that might be present; (2) in any stationary axisymmetric spacetime the stress-energy is always type I on any horizon that might be present; (3) on any Killing horizon that is extendable to a bifurcation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
