Case Level Counterfactual Reasoning in Process Mining
Mahnaz Sadat Qafari, Wil van der Aalst

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel approach using structural equation models and counterfactual reasoning in process mining to identify causal relationships and suggest process improvements, implemented as a ProM plug-in and evaluated on multiple datasets.
Contribution
It adapts causal inference techniques for process mining, enabling case-level counterfactual analysis and causal diagnostics beyond correlation.
Findings
Effective causal analysis demonstrated on real datasets
Identifies potential process interventions for improvement
Provides a new tool for causal reasoning in process mining
Abstract
Process mining is widely used to diagnose processes and uncover performance and compliance problems. It is also possible to see relations between different behavioral aspects, e.g., cases that deviate more at the beginning of the process tend to get delayed in the later part of the process. However, correlations do not necessarily reveal causalities. Moreover, standard process mining diagnostics do not indicate how to improve the process. This is the reason we advocate the use of structural equation models and counterfactual reasoning. We use results from causal inference and adapt these to be able to reason over event logs and process interventions. We have implemented the approach as a ProM plug-in and have evaluated it on several data sets.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsCausal inference
