Average Rate and Error Probability Analysis in Short Packet Communications over RIS-aided URLLC Systems
Ramin Hashemi, Samad Ali, Nurul Huda Mahmood, Matti Latva-aho

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the performance of RIS-aided URLLC systems in short packet regimes, focusing on achievable rate and error probability, considering phase errors and hardware impairments, and demonstrating the benefits of RIS in reliability and latency.
Contribution
It introduces a Gamma distribution-based SNR model for RIS channels in FBL regimes, accounting for phase errors and hardware impairments, and evaluates their impact on system performance.
Findings
Monte Carlo simulations match the Gamma SNR distribution for large RIS arrays.
RIS significantly improves reliability in URLLC scenarios.
Phase errors increase the required number of RIS elements for target error probabilities.
Abstract
In this paper, the average achievable rate and error probability of a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) aided systems is investigated for the finite blocklength (FBL) regime. The performance loss due to the presence of phase errors arising from limited quantization levels as well as hardware impairments at the RIS elements is also discussed. First, the composite channel containing the direct path plus the product of reflected channels through the RIS is characterized. Then, the distribution of the received signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is matched to a Gamma random variable whose parameters depend on the total number of RIS elements, phase errors and the channels' path loss. Next, by considering the FBL regime, the achievable rate expression and error probability are identified and the corresponding average rate and average error probability are elaborated based on the proposed SNR…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
