TL;DR
This paper develops a statistical framework to estimate whether COVID-19 vaccine efficacy wanes over time in unblinded trials, accounting for crossover effects and ethical considerations, with methods applicable to various vaccine trials.
Contribution
It introduces a potential outcomes-based statistical approach to assess vaccine efficacy decline over time in unblinded trial settings, addressing crossover complexities.
Findings
Framework clarifies assumptions about infection risk and crossover effects.
Methods enable estimation of VE at any post-vaccination time.
Applicable to other vaccine trials with similar unblinding protocols.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic due to the novel coronavirus SARS CoV-2 has inspired remarkable breakthroughs in development of vaccines against the virus and the launch of several phase 3 vaccine trials in Summer 2020 to evaluate vaccine efficacy (VE). Trials of vaccine candidates using mRNA delivery systems developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have shown substantial VEs of 94-95%, leading the US Food and Drug Administration to issue Emergency Use Authorizations and subsequent widespread administration of the vaccines. As the trials continue, a key issue is the possibility that VE may wane over time. Ethical considerations dictate that all trial participants be unblinded and those randomized to placebo be offered vaccine, leading to trial protocol amendments specifying unblinding strategies. Crossover of placebo subjects to vaccine complicates inference on waning of VE. We focus on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
