TL;DR
This study uses the Dusty SAGE semi-analytic model to analyze how dust content correlates with galaxy properties, revealing differences between dust-rich and dust-poor galaxies and their evolution over cosmic time.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed classification of galaxies based on their dust content and star formation activity, providing new insights into dust evolution and galaxy morphology.
Findings
ISM dust-rich galaxies have higher sSFR and metallicity.
Dust-rich galaxies are predominantly late-type, dust-poor are early-type.
All groups evolve similarly from z=3 to z=0, except quenched dust-rich galaxies.
Abstract
We explore the relation between dust and several fundamental properties of simulated galaxies using the Dusty SAGE semi-analytic model. In addition to tracing the standard galaxy properties, Dusty SAGE also tracks cold dust mass in the interstellar medium (ISM), hot dust mass in the halo and dust mass ejected by feedback activity. Based on their ISM dust content, we divide our galaxies into two categories: ISM dust-poor and ISM dust-rich. We split the ISM dust-poor group into two subgroups: halo dust-rich and dust-poor (the latter contains galaxies that lack dust in both the ISM and halo). Halo dust-rich galaxies have high outflow rates of heated gas and dust and are more massive. We divide ISM dust-rich galaxies based on their specific star formation rate (sSFR) into star-forming and quenched subgroups. At redshift z=0, we find that ISM dust-rich galaxies have a relatively high sSFR,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
