It was "all" for "nothing": sharp phase transitions for noiseless discrete channels
Jonathan Niles-Weed, Ilias Zadik

TL;DR
This paper proves a universal phase transition phenomenon called 'all-or-nothing' for noiseless discrete channels, including models like Bernoulli group testing, extending previous limited results to all signals with sublinear sparsity.
Contribution
It introduces a novel technique showing that for noiseless discrete channels, proving the 'all' part implies the 'nothing' part, enabling broader application of the all-or-nothing phenomenon.
Findings
Establishes the all-or-nothing phase transition for all signals with sublinear sparsity.
Shows the equivalence of 'all' and 'nothing' phases in noiseless discrete channels.
Provides a general method to prove the phenomenon using the first-moment method.
Abstract
We establish a phase transition known as the "all-or-nothing" phenomenon for noiseless discrete channels. This class of models includes the Bernoulli group testing model and the planted Gaussian perceptron model. Previously, the existence of the all-or-nothing phenomenon for such models was only known in a limited range of parameters. Our work extends the results to all signals with arbitrary sublinear sparsity. Over the past several years, the all-or-nothing phenomenon has been established in various models as an outcome of two seemingly disjoint results: one positive result establishing the "all" half of all-or-nothing, and one impossibility result establishing the "nothing" half. Our main technique in the present work is to show that for noiseless discrete channels, the "all" half implies the "nothing" half, that is a proof of "all" can be turned into a proof of "nothing." Since…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
