On the stellar clustering and architecture of planetary systems

TL;DR

This study investigates whether stellar clustering influences planetary orbital architecture, finding mixed results and highlighting the complexity of factors like age and environment in shaping planetary systems.

Contribution

It provides an analysis of the impact of stellar clustering on planetary orbital periods using homogeneous samples, revealing no clear link and emphasizing the need for larger datasets.

Findings

No significant difference in planetary periods between cluster and field stars in smaller samples.

A significant difference emerges with larger samples, but age differences complicate interpretation.

The mechanisms shaping planetary orbits in clustered environments remain unclear, indicating complex underlying processes.

Abstract

Revealing the mechanisms shaping the architecture of planetary systems is crucial for our understanding of their formation and evolution. In this context, it has been recently proposed that stellar clustering might be the key in shaping the orbital architecture of exoplanets. The main goal of this work is to explore the factors that shape the orbits of planets. We used a homogeneous sample of relatively young FGK dwarf stars with RV detected planets and tested the hypothesis that their association to phase space (position-velocity) over-densities ('cluster' stars) and under-densities ('field' stars) impacts the orbital periods of planets. When controlling for the host star properties, on a sample of 52 planets orbiting around 'cluster' stars and 15 planets orbiting around 'field' star, we found no significant difference in the period distribution of planets orbiting these two populations of stars. By considering an extended sample of 73 planets orbiting around 'cluster' stars and 25 planets orbiting 'field' stars, a significant different in the planetary period distributions emerged. However, the hosts associated to stellar under-densities appeared to be significantly older than their 'cluster' counterparts. This did not allow us to conclude whether the planetary architecture is related to age, environment, or both. We further studied a sample of planets orbiting 'cluster' stars to study the mechanism responsible for the shaping of orbits of planets in similar environments. We could not identify a parameter that can unambiguously be responsible for the orbital architecture of massive planets, perhaps, indicating the complexity of the issue. Conclusions. Increased number of planets in clusters and in over-density environments will help to build large and unbiased samples which will then allow to better understand the dominant processes shaping the orbits of planets.