TL;DR
This paper compares the preferential attachment phenomenon in Bitcoin and Ethereum networks, showing it remains a key factor in their growth, supported by new data and an efficient analysis tool.
Contribution
It provides an updated empirical analysis of preferential attachment in Bitcoin and Ethereum, including a new dataset and software for large-scale network analysis.
Findings
Preferential attachment persists in both Bitcoin and Ethereum networks.
The study introduces a scalable software tool for analyzing large transaction networks.
Bitcoin and Ethereum networks exhibit similar growth dynamics driven by rich-get-richer mechanisms.
Abstract
Bitcoin and Ethereum transactions present one of the largest real-world complex networks that are publicly available for study, including a detailed picture of their time evolution. As such, they have received a considerable amount of attention from the network science community, beside analysis from an economic or cryptography perspective. Among these studies, in an analysis on the early instance of the Bitcoin network, we have shown the clear presence of the preferential attachment, or "rich-get-richer" phenomenon. Now, we revisit this question, using a recent version of the Bitcoin network that has grown almost 100-fold since our original analysis. Furthermore, we additionally carry out a comparison with Ethereum, the second most important cryptocurrency. Our results show that preferential attachment continues to be a key factor in the evolution of both the Bitcoin and Ethereum…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
