Universal properties of the high- and low-{\alpha} disk: small intrinsic abundance scatter and migrating stars
Yuxi (Lucy) Lu, Melissa Ness, Tobias Buck, Joel Zinn

TL;DR
This study compares the age-abundance relations of stars in the high- and low-{\alpha} disks of the Milky Way, revealing universal element production and signatures of galaxy formation processes like inside-out growth and radial migration.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of age-abundance relations across the Milky Way's disks and introduces a new age catalogue for APOGEE stars with improved age estimates.
Findings
Similar median intrinsic dispersions (~0.04 dex) in both disks suggest universal nucleosynthesis.
Shallower age-abundance relations in the high-{\alpha} disk indicate different formation histories.
Evidence of radial migration and inside-out formation patterns in the stellar distribution.
Abstract
The detailed age-chemical abundance relations of stars measures time-dependent chemical evolution.These trends offer strong empirical constraints on nucleosynthetic processes, as well as the homogeneityof star-forming gas. Characterizing chemical abundances of stars across the Milky Way over time has been made possible very recently, thanks to surveys like Gaia, APOGEE and Kepler. Studies of the low- disk have shown that individual elements have unique age-abundance trends and the intrinsic dispersion around these relations is small. In this study, we examine and compare the age distribution of stars across both the high and low- disk and quantify the intrinsic dispersion of 16 elements around their age-abundance relations at [Fe/H] = 0 using APOGEE DR16. We find the high- disk has shallower age-abundance relations compared to the low- disk, but…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
