On the Fokker-Planck approximation in the kinetic equation of multicomponent classical nucleation theory
Yuri S. Djikaev, Eli Ruckenstein, and Mark Swihart

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which the Fokker-Planck approximation accurately describes multicomponent nucleation kinetics, highlighting when higher-order effects must be considered for precise modeling.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the parameters affecting the validity of the Fokker-Planck approximation in multicomponent nucleation and suggests necessary modifications for accurate predictions.
Findings
The Fokker-Planck approximation is valid only under certain smallness conditions of parameters.
Higher-order derivatives or nonlinear force coefficients emerge when parameters are not small.
Numerical results indicate the conventional nucleation rate expression may need modification for binary systems.
Abstract
We examine the validity of the Fokker-Planck equation with linear force coefficients as an approximation to the kinetic equation of nucleation in homogeneous isothermal multicomponent condensation. Starting with a discrete equation of balance governing the temporal evolution of the distribution function of an ensemble of multicomponent droplets and reducing it (by means of Taylor series expansions) to the differential form in the vicinity of the saddle point of the free energy surface, we have identified the parameters whereof the smallness is necessary for the resulting kinetic equation to have the form of the Fokker-Planck equation with linear (in droplet variables) force coefficients. The "non-smallness" of these parameters results either in the appearance of the third or higher order partial derivatives of the distribution function in the kinetic equation or in its force…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
