Parameterized Complexity of Logic-Based Argumentation in Schaefer's Framework
Yasir Mahmood, Arne Meier, Johannes Schmidt

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the computational complexity of logic-based argumentation problems within Schaefer's propositional framework, identifying fixed-parameter tractability and intractability boundaries for various fragments and parameters.
Contribution
It provides a detailed parameterized complexity classification of argumentation problems in propositional logic, revealing tractability boundaries and high intractability cases.
Findings
ARG-Check is DP-complete.
ARG and ARG-Rel are at the second level of the polynomial hierarchy.
Several parameterizations lead to fixed-parameter tractability, others are paraNP-hard.
Abstract
Logic-based argumentation is a well-established formalism modelling nonmonotonic reasoning. It has been playing a major role in AI for decades, now. Informally, a set of formulas is the support for a given claim if it is consistent, subset-minimal, and implies the claim. In such a case, the pair of the support and the claim together is called an argument. In this paper, we study the propositional variants of the following three computational tasks studied in argumentation: ARG (exists a support for a given claim with respect to a given set of formulas), ARG-Check (is a given set a support for a given claim), and ARG-Rel (similarly as ARG plus requiring an additionally given formula to be contained in the support). ARG-Check is complete for the complexity class DP, and the other two problems are known to be complete for the second level of the polynomial hierarchy (Parson et al., J. Log.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies
