TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that under common measurement assumptions, two qubits cannot be recycled to generate Bell nonlocality between multiple independent observers on each side, revealing fundamental limitations on sequential quantum correlations.
Contribution
The paper provides strong analytic and numerical evidence for limitations on sharing Bell nonlocality sequentially, introducing monogamy relations and exploring measurement bias effects.
Findings
Two-qubit recycling for Bell nonlocality is fundamentally limited.
Monogamy relations prevent two-sided recycling under mild assumptions.
Biased measurements can enable limited two-sided recycling in specific cases.
Abstract
We give strong analytic and numerical evidence that, under mild measurement assumptions, two qubits cannot both be recycled to generate Bell nonlocality between multiple independent observers on each side. This is surprising, as under the same assumptions it is possible to recycle just one of the qubits an arbitrarily large number of times [P. J. Brown and R. Colbeck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 090401 (2020)]. We derive corresponding 'one-sided monogamy relations' that rule out two-sided recycling for a wide range of parameters, based on a general tradeoff relation between the strengths and maximum reversibilities of qubit measurements. We also show if the assumptions are relaxed to allow sufficiently biased measurement selections, then there is a narrow range of measurement strengths that allows two-sided recycling for two observers on each side, and propose an experimental test. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
