The Challenges Ahead for Multimessenger Analyses of Gravitational Waves and Kilonova: a Case Study on GW190425
Geert Raaijmakers, Samaya Nissanke, Francois Foucart, Mansi M., Kasliwal, Mattia Bulla, Rodrigo Fernandez, Amelia Henkel, Tanja Hinderer,, Kenta Hotokezaka, Kamil\.e Luko\v{s}i\=ut\.e, Tejaswi Venumadhav, Sarah, Antier, Michael W. Coughlin, Tim Dietrich, Thomas D. P. Edwards

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian framework for joint analysis of gravitational wave and electromagnetic data, focusing on kilonova light curves from black hole-neutron star mergers, exemplified by GW190425, highlighting current challenges and data needs.
Contribution
It develops a new Bayesian analysis method that incorporates systematic uncertainties and extends rapid GW signal analysis to include extrinsic parameters, applied to GW190425.
Findings
Improved mapping between binary properties and kilonova light curves is needed.
Enhanced EM data quality can help resolve parameter degeneracies.
The framework enables more comprehensive multi-messenger analysis of GW events.
Abstract
In recent years, there have been significant advances in multi-messenger astronomy due to the discovery of the first, and so far only confirmed, gravitational wave event with a simultaneous electromagnetic (EM) counterpart, as well as improvements in numerical simulations, gravitational wave (GW) detectors, and transient astronomy. This has led to the exciting possibility of performing joint analyses of the GW and EM data, providing additional constraints on fundamental properties of the binary progenitor and merger remnant. Here, we present a new Bayesian framework that allows inference of these properties, while taking into account the systematic modeling uncertainties that arise when mapping from GW binary progenitor properties to photometric light curves. We extend the relative binning method presented in Zackay et al. (2018) to include extrinsic GW parameters for fast analysis of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
