Statistical analysis of fireballs: Seismic signature survey
T. Neidhart, K. Miljkovi\'c, E.K. Sansom, H.A.R. Devillepoix, T., Kawamura, J.-L. Dimech, M.A. Wieczorek, P.A. Bland

TL;DR
This study analyzes seismic data to detect fireballs, revealing that seismic sensors can identify a significant portion of fireball events within 200 km, and suggests expanding seismic monitoring for better detection.
Contribution
First seismic bulk analysis of a large fireball dataset, demonstrating seismic detection potential and factors influencing fireball identification in seismic records.
Findings
25 fireballs detected in seismic data, representing 1.8% of surveyed fireballs.
Seismic peaks align with expected arrival times of shock waves from fireballs.
Detection likelihood depends on fireball energy, entry angle, and seismic sensor sensitivity.
Abstract
Fireballs are infrequently recorded by seismic sensors on the ground. If recorded, they are usually reported as one-off events. This study is the first seismic bulk analysis of the largest single fireball data set, observed by the Desert Fireball Network (DFN) in Australia in the period 2014-2019. The DFN typically observes fireballs from cm-m scale impactors. We identified 25 fireballs in seismic time series data recorded by the Australian National Seismograph Network (ANSN). This corresponds to 1.8% of surveyed fireballs, at the kinetic energy range of 10 to 10 J. The peaks observed in the seismic time series data were consistent with calculated arrival times of the direct airwave or ground-coupled Rayleigh wave caused by shock waves by the fireball in the atmosphere (either due to fragmentation or the passage of the Mach cone). Our work suggests that identification of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
