Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The inferred mass--metallicity relation from z=0 to 3.5 via forensic SED fitting
Sabine Bellstedt, Aaron S. G. Robotham, Simon P. Driver, Jessica E., Thorne, Luke J. M. Davies, Benne W. Holwerda, Andrew M. Hopkins, Maritza A., Lara-Lopez, \'Angel R. L\'opez-S\'anchez, Steven Phillipps

TL;DR
This study uses forensic SED fitting to analyze the metallicity evolution of galaxies from z=0 to 3.5, successfully reproducing observed mass-metallicity relations and revealing a dynamic galaxy plane over cosmic time.
Contribution
It introduces an evolving metallicity implementation in SED fitting, enabling accurate reconstruction of galaxy metallicity histories across cosmic epochs.
Findings
The inferred mass-metallicity relation matches observations at all epochs.
Galaxies occupy a defined plane in mass-metallicity-SFR space, evolving subtly over time.
The metallicity implementation improves the accuracy of galaxy property estimations.
Abstract
We analyse the metallicity histories of ~4,500 galaxies from the GAMA survey at z<0.06 modelled by the SED-fitting code ProSpect using an evolving metallicity implementation. These metallicity histories, in combination with the associated star formation histories, allow us to analyse the inferred gas-phase mass--metallicity relation. Furthermore, we extract the mass--metallicity relation at a sequence of epochs in cosmic history, to track the evolving mass--metallicity relation with time. Through comparison with observations of gas-phase metallicity over a large range of redshifts, we show that, remarkably, our forensic SED analysis has produced an evolving mass--metallicity relationship that is consistent with observations at all epochs. We additionally analyse the three dimensional mass--metallicity--SFR space, showing that galaxies occupy a clearly defined plane. This plane is shown…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
