TL;DR
This paper reviews methods for quantifying confidence in molecular property predictions, emphasizing the importance of uncertainty assessment to improve drug design workflows and reduce experimental costs.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of strategies for assessing uncertainty in molecular property prediction models and their impact on drug discovery processes.
Findings
Uncertainty sources include dataset bias and size.
Molecular docking and free-energy simulations are key for property estimation.
Propagating uncertainty improves reliability of generative models.
Abstract
Introduction: Computational modeling has rapidly advanced over the last decades, especially to predict molecular properties for chemistry, material science and drug design. Recently, machine learning techniques have emerged as a powerful and cost-effective strategy to learn from existing datasets and perform predictions on unseen molecules. Accordingly, the explosive rise of data-driven techniques raises an important question: What confidence can be assigned to molecular property predictions and what techniques can be used for that purpose? Areas covered: In this work, we discuss popular strategies for predicting molecular properties relevant to drug design, their corresponding uncertainty sources and methods to quantify uncertainty and confidence. First, our considerations for assessing confidence begin with dataset bias and size, data-driven property prediction and feature design.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
