On the Axiomatisability of Parallel Composition
Luca Aceto, Valentina Castiglioni, Anna Ingolfsdottir, Bas Luttik and, Mathias R. Pedersen

TL;DR
This paper investigates the possibility of finite axiomatizations for parallel composition in process algebra, providing positive results for some semantics and negative results for others, highlighting the limits of axiomatizability.
Contribution
It offers the first finite, ground-complete axiomatisations for certain semantics in BCCSP and proves the non-existence of such axiomatizations for others, including bisimilarity.
Findings
Finite, ground-complete axiomatisations for some semantics
No finite axiomatization exists for bisimilarity and related semantics
Negative results apply to nested trace and simulation semantics
Abstract
This paper studies the existence of finite equational axiomatisations of the interleaving parallel composition operator modulo the behavioural equivalences in van Glabbeek's linear time-branching time spectrum. In the setting of the process algebra BCCSP over a finite set of actions, we provide finite, ground-complete axiomatisations for various simulation and (decorated) trace semantics. We also show that no congruence over BCCSP that includes bisimilarity and is included in possible futures equivalence has a finite, ground-complete axiomatisation; this negative result applies to all the nested trace and nested simulation semantics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
