Incompatibility of generic hugeness principles
Monroe Eskew

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the weakest forms of Foreman's minimal generic hugeness axioms are mutually incompatible on neighboring cardinals and cannot be achieved through standard forcing methods.
Contribution
It establishes the fundamental incompatibility of certain minimal generic hugeness axioms and shows their limitations within conventional forcing frameworks.
Findings
Weakest versions of the axioms cannot hold simultaneously on adjacent cardinals.
Standard forcing techniques cannot produce models satisfying these axioms.
The results highlight inherent limitations in the axiomatization of generic hugeness.
Abstract
We show that the weakest versions of Foreman's minimal generic hugeness axioms cannot hold simultaneously on adjacent cardinals. Moreover, conventional forcing techniques cannot produce a model of one of these axioms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Economic theories and models
