Distinction and Base Change
U. K. Anandavardhanan

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between distinguished representations of p-adic groups, functoriality, and base change, proving a conjecture for SL(n) and revealing new connections for GL(n).
Contribution
It proves Prasad's conjecture for SL(n) in the generic case and uncovers a novel link between distinction and base change in invariant linear forms.
Findings
Proof of Prasad's conjecture for SL(n) (generic case)
Discovery of base change influence on invariant form proportionality
New connection between distinction and base change for GL(n)
Abstract
An irreducible smooth representation of a -adic group is said to be distinguished with respect to a subgroup if it admits a non-trivial -invariant linear form. When is the fixed group of an involution on it is suggested by the works of Herv\'e Jacquet from the nineties that distinction can be characterized in terms of the principle of functoriality. If the involution is the Galois involution then a recent conjecture of Dipendra Prasad predicts a formula for the dimension of the space of invariant linear forms which once again involves base change. We will describe the proof of this conjecture (in the generic case) for which is joint work with Dipendra Prasad. Then we describe one more newly discovered connection between distinction and base change which is that base change information appears in the constant of proportionality between two natural invariant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · advanced mathematical theories
