Contextual Argument Component Classification for Class Discussions
Luca Lugini, Diane Litman

TL;DR
This paper investigates how local discourse and speaker context can enhance argument component classification in multi-party classroom discussions, demonstrating that incorporating these contexts improves model performance depending on their size and position.
Contribution
It introduces a computational model that effectively integrates local discourse and speaker context for argument component classification in classroom discussions.
Findings
Both context types improve classification accuracy.
Performance gains depend on context size and position.
Contextual information enhances argument mining in educational settings.
Abstract
Argument mining systems often consider contextual information, i.e. information outside of an argumentative discourse unit, when trained to accomplish tasks such as argument component identification, classification, and relation extraction. However, prior work has not carefully analyzed the utility of different contextual properties in context-aware models. In this work, we show how two different types of contextual information, local discourse context and speaker context, can be incorporated into a computational model for classifying argument components in multi-party classroom discussions. We find that both context types can improve performance, although the improvements are dependent on context size and position.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
