Photometric and spectroscopic evolution of the interacting transient AT 2016jbu (Gaia16cfr)
S. J. Brennan, M. Fraser, J. Johansson, A. Pastorello, R. Kotak, H. F., Stevance, T. -W. Chen, J. J. Eldridge, S. Bose, P. J. Brown, E. Callis, R., Cartier, M. Dennefeld, Subo Dong, P. Duffy, N. Elias-Rosa, G. Hosseinzadeh,, E. Hsiao, H. Kuncarayakti, A. Martin-Carrillo

TL;DR
This paper presents detailed multi-wavelength observations of the interacting transient AT 2016jbu, revealing complex circumstellar material, variable lightcurve behavior, and spectral features that inform its nature and relation to similar transients like SN 2009ip.
Contribution
It provides high-cadence, extended coverage of AT 2016jbu's evolution, offering new insights into its circumstellar environment and spectral characteristics compared to prior studies.
Findings
AT 2016jbu experienced two luminous events with significant variability.
Spectra show narrow emission lines and asymmetric hydrogen profiles indicating complex CSM.
Late-time spectra lack forbidden lines, suggesting it is not a typical core-collapse supernova.
Abstract
We present the results from a high cadence, multi-wavelength observation campaign of AT 2016jbu (aka Gaia16cfr), an interacting transient. This dataset complements the current literature by adding higher cadence as well as extended coverage of the lightcurve evolution and late-time spectroscopic evolution. Photometric coverage reveals that AT 2016jbu underwent significant photometric variability followed by two luminous events, the latter of which reached an absolute magnitude of M-18.5 mag. This is similar to the transient SN 2009ip whose nature is still debated. Spectra are dominated by narrow emission lines and show a blue continuum during the peak of the second event. AT 2016jbu shows signatures of a complex, non-homogeneous circumstellar material (CSM). We see slowly evolving asymmetric hydrogen line profiles, with velocities of 500km seen in narrow emission…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
