QSO photometric redshifts using machine learning and neural networks
S. J. Curran, J. P. Moss, Y. C. Perrott

TL;DR
This paper compares machine learning methods, especially deep learning, for estimating quasar photometric redshifts, demonstrating that deep learning achieves high accuracy and potential for large-scale surveys like SKA.
Contribution
It introduces a deep learning approach for quasar photometric redshift estimation that performs comparably to complex algorithms using simple, readily available data.
Findings
Deep learning achieves a standard deviation of 0.24 in photometric redshift predictions.
Deep learning outperforms kNN and decision tree regression in accuracy.
The method maintains good accuracy ({ extDelta}z < 0.1) up to redshift 2.5.
Abstract
The scientific value of the next generation of large continuum surveys would be greatly increased if the redshifts of the newly detected sources could be rapidly and reliably estimated. Given the observational expense of obtaining spectroscopic redshifts for the large number of new detections expected, there has been substantial recent work on using machine learning techniques to obtain photometric redshifts. Here we compare the accuracy of the predicted photometric redshifts obtained from Deep Learning(DL) with the k-Nearest Neighbour (kNN) and the Decision Tree Regression (DTR) algorithms. We find using a combination of near-infrared, visible and ultraviolet magnitudes, trained upon a sample of SDSS QSOs, that the kNN and DL algorithms produce the best self-validation result with a standard deviation of {\sigma} = 0.24. Testing on various sub-samples, we find that the DL algorithm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
