Determination of responses of liquid xenon to low energy electron and nuclear recoils using the PandaX-II detector
Binbin Yan, Abdusalam Abdukerim, Wei Chen, Xun Chen and, Yunhua Chen, Chen Cheng, Xiangyi Cui, Yingjie Fan, Deqing Fang, and Changbo Fu, Mengting Fu, Lisheng Geng, Karl Giboni, Linhui Gu, and Xuyuan Guo, Ke Han, Changda He, Di Huang, Peiyao Huang and, Yan Huang, Yanlin Huang

TL;DR
This paper systematically calibrates the responses of the PandaX-II liquid xenon detector to low energy electron and nuclear recoils, providing empirical models that accurately describe the light and charge yields within specified energy ranges.
Contribution
It presents the first comprehensive calibration of PandaX-II's responses to low energy recoils using multiple sources and drift fields, with empirical models fitting the data well.
Findings
Calibrated electron recoil responses from 1-25 keV.
Calibrated nuclear recoil responses from 4-80 keV.
Developed empirical models with quantified uncertainties.
Abstract
We report a systematic determination of the responses of PandaX-II, a dual phase xenon time projection chamber detector, to low energy recoils. The electron recoil (ER) and nuclear recoil (NR) responses are calibrated, respectively, with injected tritiated methane or Rn source, and with Am-Be neutron source, within an energy range from keV (ER) and keV (NR), under the two drift fields of 400 and 317 V/cm. An empirical model is used to fit the light yield and charge yield for both types of recoils. The best fit models can well describe the calibration data. The systematic uncertainties of the fitted models are obtained via statistical comparison against the data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
