TL;DR
This study evaluates the robustness of deep learning models for chest X-ray interpretation when applied to photos and external datasets, revealing variability in generalization performance compared to radiologists.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic assessment of multiple models' generalization to photos and external data without fine-tuning, highlighting factors affecting robustness.
Findings
Some models perform comparably to radiologists under distribution shifts.
All models' performance drops on photos, but some outperform radiologists on external datasets.
Model robustness varies significantly depending on training and dataset characteristics.
Abstract
Recent advances in training deep learning models have demonstrated the potential to provide accurate chest X-ray interpretation and increase access to radiology expertise. However, poor generalization due to data distribution shifts in clinical settings is a key barrier to implementation. In this study, we measured the diagnostic performance for 8 different chest X-ray models when applied to (1) smartphone photos of chest X-rays and (2) external datasets without any finetuning. All models were developed by different groups and submitted to the CheXpert challenge, and re-applied to test datasets without further tuning. We found that (1) on photos of chest X-rays, all 8 models experienced a statistically significant drop in task performance, but only 3 performed significantly worse than radiologists on average, and (2) on the external set, none of the models performed statistically…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
