Political Bias and Factualness in News Sharing across more than 100,000 Online Communities
Galen Weld, Maria Glenski, Tim Althoff

TL;DR
This large-scale study of over 550 million news links on Reddit reveals significant political bias and factualness disparities across communities, showing Reddit's relative resilience to misinformation compared to Twitter.
Contribution
The paper provides the largest analysis to date of news sharing on Reddit, quantifying political bias and factualness, and examining community behaviors and content concentration related to misinformation.
Findings
Right-leaning communities have 105% more variance in political bias.
Biased and low factual content receives 20% fewer upvotes.
Extremely biased content is concentrated in only 0.5% of communities.
Abstract
As civil discourse increasingly takes place online, misinformation and the polarization of news shared in online communities have become ever more relevant concerns with real world harms across our society. Studying online news sharing at scale is challenging due to the massive volume of content which is shared by millions of users across thousands of communities. Therefore, existing research has largely focused on specific communities or specific interventions, such as bans. However, understanding the prevalence and spread of misinformation and polarization more broadly, across thousands of online communities, is critical for the development of governance strategies, interventions, and community design. Here, we conduct the largest study of news sharing on reddit to date, analyzing more than 550 million links spanning 4 years. We use non-partisan news source ratings from Media…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
