Optimizing wind farms layouts for maximum energy production using probabilistic inference: Benchmarking reveals superior computational efficiency and scalability
Aditya Dhoot, Enrico G. A. Antonini, David A. Romero, Cristina H. Amon

TL;DR
This paper introduces a probabilistic inference method for wind farm layout optimization that achieves near-optimal solutions with higher efficiency and scalability compared to traditional algorithms, especially at higher discretization resolutions.
Contribution
It presents a novel probabilistic inference approach using sequential tree-reweighted message passing for wind farm layout optimization, demonstrating superior computational efficiency and scalability.
Findings
Near-optimal layouts within 3% of the best with low resolution
Up to 9% more power capacity at higher resolutions
Significantly reduced computational cost compared to state-of-the-art methods
Abstract
Successful development of wind farms relies on the optimal siting of wind turbines to maximize the power capacity under stochastic wind conditions and wake losses caused by neighboring turbines. This paper presents a novel method to quickly generate approximate optimal layouts to support infrastructure design decisions. We model the quadratic integer formulation of the discretized layout design problem with an undirected graph that succinctly captures the spatial dependencies of the design parameters caused by wake interactions. On the undirected graph, we apply probabilistic inference using sequential tree-reweighted message passing to approximate turbine siting. We assess the effectiveness of our method by benchmarking against a state-of-the-art branch and cut algorithm under varying wind regime complexities and wind farm discretization resolutions. For low resolutions, probabilistic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
