Moving frames and compatibility conditions for three-dimensional director fields
Luiz C. B. da Silva, Efi Efrati

TL;DR
This paper uses the method of moving frames to determine the minimal local fields and compatibility conditions needed to describe three-dimensional director fields embedded in curved spaces, advancing understanding of geometric frustration.
Contribution
It introduces a set of five local fields that fully determine 3D director fields and derives six differential relations linking these fields to the space's curvature.
Findings
Five local fields suffice to describe 3D director fields.
Six differential relations connect local fields and curvature.
Classification of uniform distortion director fields in constant curvature spaces.
Abstract
The geometry and topology of the region in which a director field is embedded impose limitations on the kind of supported orientational order. These limitations manifest as compatibility conditions that relate the quantities describing the director field to the geometry of the embedding space. For example, in two dimensions (2D) the splay and bend fields suffice to determine a director uniquely (up to rigid motions) and must comply with one relation linear in the Gaussian curvature of the embedding manifold. In 3D there are additional local fields describing the director, i.e. fields available to a local observer residing within the material, and a number of distinct ways to yield geometric frustration. So far it was unknown how many such local fields are required to uniquely describe a 3D director field, nor what are the compatibility relations they must satisfy. In this work, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
