New Determinations of the UV Luminosity Functions from z~9 to z~2 show a remarkable consistency with halo growth and a constant star formation efficiency

TL;DR

This study provides the most comprehensive UV luminosity functions from redshift 2 to 9 using HST data, revealing consistent galaxy evolution trends aligned with halo growth and constant star formation efficiency.

Contribution

It offers the first extensive UV luminosity function measurements across z~2-9 with over 24,000 sources, demonstrating smooth evolution consistent with halo growth models.

Findings

Faint-end slope alpha flattens from -2.4 at z~10 to -1.5 at z~2

Minimal evolution in characteristic luminosity M* for z>~2.5

Normalization log10 phi* increases monotonically from z~10 to z~2

Abstract

Here we provide the most comprehensive determinations of the rest-frame $UV$ LF available to date with HST at z~2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Essentially all of the non-cluster extragalactic legacy fields are utilized, including the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF), the Hubble Frontier Field parallel fields, and all five CANDELS fields, for a total survey area of 1136 arcmin^2. Our determinations include galaxies at z~2-3 leveraging the deep HDUV, UVUDF, and ERS WFC3/UVIS observations available over a ~150 arcmin^2 area in the GOODS North and GOODS South regions. All together, our collective samples include >24,000 sources, >2.3x larger than previous selections with HST. 5766, 6332, 7240, 3449, 1066, 601, 246, and 33 sources are identified at z~2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. Combining our results with an earlier z~10 LF determination by Oesch+2018a, we quantify the evolution of the $UV$ LF. Our results indicate that there is (1) a smooth flattening of the faint-end slope alpha from alpha~-2.4 at z~10 to -1.5 at z~2, (2) minimal evolution in the characteristic luminosity M* at z>~2.5, and (3) a monotonic increase in the normalization log_10 phi* from z~10 to z~2, which can be well described by a simple second-order polynomial, consistent with an "accelerated" evolution scenario. We find that each of these trends (from z~10 to z~2.5 at least) can be readily explained on the basis of the evolution of the halo mass function and a simple constant star formation efficiency model.