Model-Independent Detection of New Physics Signals Using Interpretable Semi-Supervised Classifier Tests

TL;DR

This paper introduces a model-independent semi-supervised classifier approach for detecting unknown signals in high-dimensional physics data, demonstrating high power especially for unexpected signals.

Contribution

The paper develops a novel semi-supervised testing framework that does not rely on signal models, enhancing detection of unforeseen physics signals.

Findings

Semi-supervised tests perform comparably to supervised methods for known signals.

Semi-supervised tests have higher power for unexpected signals.

Proposed methods effectively interpret detected signals.

Abstract

A central goal in experimental high energy physics is to detect new physics signals that are not explained by known physics. In this paper, we aim to search for new signals that appear as deviations from known Standard Model physics in high-dimensional particle physics data. To do this, we determine whether there is any statistically significant difference between the distribution of Standard Model background samples and the distribution of the experimental observations, which are a mixture of the background and a potential new signal. Traditionally, one also assumes access to a sample from a model for the hypothesized signal distribution. Here we instead investigate a model-independent method that does not make any assumptions about the signal and uses a semi-supervised classifier to detect the presence of the signal in the experimental data. We construct three test statistics using the classifier: an estimated likelihood ratio test (LRT) statistic, a test based on the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and a test based on the misclassification error (MCE). Additionally, we propose a method for estimating the signal strength parameter and explore active subspace methods to interpret the proposed semi-supervised classifier in order to understand the properties of the detected signal. We also propose a Score test statistic that can be used in the model-dependent setting. We investigate the performance of the methods on a simulated data set related to the search for the Higgs boson at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. We demonstrate that the semi-supervised tests have power competitive with the classical supervised methods for a well-specified signal, but much higher power for an unexpected signal which might be entirely missed by the supervised tests.