Neither Contextuality nor Nonlocality Admits Catalysts
Martti Karvonen

TL;DR
This paper proves that neither contextuality nor nonlocality can be enhanced through catalysts in resource transformations, highlighting a fundamental difference from entanglement behavior.
Contribution
It establishes that resource theories of contextuality and nonlocality do not admit catalysts, unlike entanglement, revealing key distinctions among quantum resources.
Findings
Resource theory of contextuality admits no catalysts.
Nonlocality also does not admit catalysts.
Catalysis remains impossible even with enhanced free operations.
Abstract
We show that the resource theory of contextuality does not admit catalysts, i.e., there are no correlations that can enable an otherwise impossible resource conversion and still be recovered afterward. As a corollary, we observe that the same holds for nonlocality. As entanglement allows for catalysts, this adds a further example to the list of "anomalies of entanglement," showing that nonlocality and entanglement behave differently as resources. We also show that catalysis remains impossible even if, instead of classical randomness, we allow some more powerful behaviors to be used freely in the free transformations of the resource theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
