A proof of concept study for machine learning application to stenosis detection
Gareth Jones, Jim Parr, Perumal Nithiarasu, Sanjay Pant

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that machine learning classifiers, trained on virtual patient data, can moderately accurately detect arterial stenosis, with fewer measurements sometimes sufficing and some measurements being more informative.
Contribution
The paper presents a proof of concept showing ML classifiers can detect arterial stenosis using virtual data, outperforming some clinical methods and identifying key measurements.
Findings
ML classifiers achieve >80% specificity and 50-75% sensitivity.
The best classifier has an AUC of 0.75, better than 20 clinical methods.
Few measurements can match the accuracy of using all measurements.
Abstract
This proof of concept (PoC) assesses the ability of machine learning (ML) classifiers to predict the presence of a stenosis in a three vessel arterial system consisting of the abdominal aorta bifurcating into the two common iliacs. A virtual patient database (VPD) is created using one-dimensional pulse wave propagation model of haemodynamics. Four different machine learning (ML) methods are used to train and test a series of classifiers -- both binary and multiclass -- to distinguish between healthy and unhealthy virtual patients (VPs) using different combinations of pressure and flow-rate measurements. It is found that the ML classifiers achieve specificities larger than 80% and sensitivities ranging from 50-75%. The most balanced classifier also achieves an area under the receiver operative characteristic curve of 0.75, outperforming approximately 20 methods used in clinical practice,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
