A longitudinal analysis of students' motivational characteristics in introductory physics courses: Gender differences
Emily Marshman, Zeynep Y. Kalender, Christian Schunn, Timothy, Nokes-Malach, and Chandralekha Singh

TL;DR
This study longitudinally examines gender differences in motivational factors among introductory physics students, revealing persistent disparities influenced by societal stereotypes, with implications for improving pedagogical strategies to promote inclusivity.
Contribution
It introduces a framework considering multiple factors affecting student motivation and provides empirical data on gender-specific motivational characteristics in physics education.
Findings
Female students showed lower self-efficacy, fascination, and value for physics.
Grit levels were similar or higher among female students compared to males.
Gender differences are partly due to societal stereotypes and biases.
Abstract
The lack of diversity and the under-performance of underrepresented students in STEM courses have been the focus of researchers in the last decade. In particular, many hypotheses have been put forth for the reasons for the under-representation and under-performance of women in physics. Here, we present a framework for helping all students learn in science courses that takes into account four factors: 1) characteristics of instruction and learning tools, 2) implementation of instruction and learning tools, 3) student characteristics, and 4) students' environments. While there has been much research on factor 1 (characteristics of instruction and learning tools), there has been less focus on factor 2 (students' characteristics, and in particular, motivational factors). Here, we focus on the baseline motivational characteristics of introductory physics students obtained from survey data to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
