From Proper Scoring Rules to Max-Min Optimal Forecast Aggregation
Eric Neyman, Tim Roughgarden

TL;DR
This paper establishes a theoretical link between proper scoring rules and forecast aggregation methods, introducing quasi-arithmetic pooling as a unified framework with optimality and learnability properties.
Contribution
It introduces quasi-arithmetic pooling as a novel aggregation method derived from proper scoring rules, connecting incentive-compatible elicitation with forecast aggregation.
Findings
QA pooling with quadratic and logarithmic scores corresponds to linear and logarithmic aggregation.
Using QA pooling maximizes worst-case profit for agents subcontracting experts.
Aggregator scores are concave in expert weights, enabling low-regret online learning.
Abstract
This paper forges a strong connection between two seemingly unrelated forecasting problems: incentive-compatible forecast elicitation and forecast aggregation. Proper scoring rules are the well-known solution to the former problem. To each such rule we associate a corresponding method of aggregation, mapping expert forecasts and expert weights to a "consensus forecast," which we call *quasi-arithmetic (QA) pooling* with respect to . We justify this correspondence in several ways: - QA pooling with respect to the two most well-studied scoring rules (quadratic and logarithmic) corresponds to the two most well-studied forecast aggregation methods (linear and logarithmic). - Given a scoring rule used for payment, a forecaster agent who sub-contracts several experts, paying them in proportion to their weights, is best off aggregating the experts' reports using QA pooling with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
