Expected utility theory on mixture spaces without the completeness axiom
David McCarthy, Kalle Mikkola, Teruji Thomas

TL;DR
This paper explores conditions under which a mixture preorder on a mixture space can be represented by real-valued, mixture-preserving functions, especially focusing on the roles of mixture continuity, topology, and the new axiom of countable domination.
Contribution
It introduces the countable domination axiom and analyzes its role in ensuring mixture-preserving multi-representations in uncountable spaces.
Findings
Mixture continuity, combined with countable domination, guarantees multi-representations in uncountable spaces.
Continuity and closedness are necessary but not sufficient for mixture-preserving representations.
The paper discusses conditions for the existence and uniqueness of strictly increasing multi-representations.
Abstract
A mixture preorder is a preorder on a mixture space (such as a convex set) that is compatible with the mixing operation. In decision theoretic terms, it satisfies the central expected utility axiom of strong independence. We consider when a mixture preorder has a multi-representation that consists of real-valued, mixture-preserving functions. If it does, it must satisfy the mixture continuity axiom of Herstein and Milnor (1953). Mixture continuity is sufficient for a mixture-preserving multi-representation when the dimension of the mixture space is countable, but not when it is uncountable. Our strongest positive result is that mixture continuity is sufficient in conjunction with a novel axiom we call countable domination, which constrains the order complexity of the mixture preorder in terms of its Archimedean structure. We also consider what happens when the mixture space is given its…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
