Improving NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database Redshift Calculations
Anthony Carr, Tamara Davis

TL;DR
This paper identifies a systematic error in NED's redshift calculations caused by a low-redshift approximation, discusses its implications, and describes updates to correct this error for more accurate astrophysical measurements.
Contribution
It reveals a previously unrecognized systematic error in NED's redshift data and details the software updates implemented to correct it for improved accuracy.
Findings
Systematic redshift errors up to 0.001 at z=1 identified
Software updates implemented to correct the systematic error
Potential impact on cosmological measurements and Hubble tension
Abstract
The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) is an impressive tool for finding near-exhaustive information on millions of astrophysical objects. Here, we outline a small systematic error that occurs in NED because a low-redshift approximation is used when making the correction from redshifts in the heliocentric frame to the cosmic microwave background (CMB) rest frame. It means that historically NED systematically misreported the values of CMB-frame redshifts by up to (about 0.001 at redshift of 1). This is a systematic error, and therefore the impact on applications requiring precise redshifts has the potential to be significant -- for example, a systematic redshift error of at low redshift could resolve the Hubble tension. We have consulted with the NED team and they are updating the software to remove this systematic error so these corrections are accurate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
