A Unified Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Graph Neural Networks

TL;DR

This paper introduces a unified framework for pruning graph neural networks and their underlying graphs, extending the lottery ticket hypothesis to GNNs, enabling efficient training and inference on large-scale graph data.

Contribution

It proposes a unified GNN sparsification framework and generalizes the lottery ticket hypothesis to GNNs, jointly pruning models and graphs for efficiency.

Findings

Achieves significant MACs savings without performance loss.

Validates the approach on multiple GNN architectures and datasets.

Demonstrates effectiveness on both small and large-scale graph tasks.

Abstract

With graphs rapidly growing in size and deeper graph neural networks (GNNs) emerging, the training and inference of GNNs become increasingly expensive. Existing network weight pruning algorithms cannot address the main space and computational bottleneck in GNNs, caused by the size and connectivity of the graph. To this end, this paper first presents a unified GNN sparsification (UGS) framework that simultaneously prunes the graph adjacency matrix and the model weights, for effectively accelerating GNN inference on large-scale graphs. Leveraging this new tool, we further generalize the recently popular lottery ticket hypothesis to GNNs for the first time, by defining a graph lottery ticket (GLT) as a pair of core sub-dataset and sparse sub-network, which can be jointly identified from the original GNN and the full dense graph by iteratively applying UGS. Like its counterpart in convolutional neural networks, GLT can be trained in isolation to match the performance of training with the full model and graph, and can be drawn from both randomly initialized and self-supervised pre-trained GNNs. Our proposal has been experimentally verified across various GNN architectures and diverse tasks, on both small-scale graph datasets (Cora, Citeseer and PubMed), and large-scale datasets from the challenging Open Graph Benchmark (OGB). Specifically, for node classification, our found GLTs achieve the same accuracies with 20%~98% MACs saving on small graphs and 25%~85% MACs saving on large ones. For link prediction, GLTs lead to 48%~97% and 70% MACs saving on small and large graph datasets, respectively, without compromising predictive performance. Codes available at https://github.com/VITA-Group/Unified-LTH-GNN.