On the stickiness of CO$_{2}$ and H$_{2}$O ice particles
Sota Arakawa, Sebastiaan Krijt

TL;DR
This study investigates why CO$_{2}$ ice particles are less sticky than H$_{2}$O ice particles, revealing that differences in viscoelastic dissipation, rather than surface energy, explain the disparity in sticking behavior.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the difference in ice particle stickiness is primarily due to variations in viscoelastic dissipation, influenced by the viscoelastic relaxation time, using a contact model.
Findings
CO$_{2}$ ice particles' sticking threshold matches elastic sphere predictions.
H$_{2}$O ice particles' sticking threshold exceeds elastic predictions.
Viscoelastic dissipation strength explains the stickiness difference.
Abstract
Laboratory experiments revealed that CO ice particles stick less efficiently than HO ice particles, and there is an order of magnitude difference in the threshold velocity for sticking. However, the surface energies and elastic moduli of CO and HO ices are comparable, and the reason why CO ice particles were poorly sticky compared to HO ice particles was unclear. Here we investigate the effects of viscoelastic dissipation on the threshold velocity for sticking of ice particles using the viscoelastic contact model derived by Krijt et al. We find that the threshold velocity for sticking of CO ice particles reported in experimental studies is comparable to that predicted for perfectly elastic spheres. In contrast, the threshold velocity for sticking of HO ice particles is an order of magnitude higher than that predicted for perfectly elastic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
