A Computability Perspective on (Verified) Machine Learning
Tonicha Crook, Jay Morgan, Arno Pauly, Markus Roggenbach

TL;DR
This paper explores verified machine learning through computable analysis, establishing a model-agnostic framework that demonstrates the fundamental computability of the underlying tasks, bridging ML verification and theoretical computability.
Contribution
It introduces a computability-based perspective on verified ML, providing a formal, model-agnostic foundation for understanding the computational nature of verification tasks.
Findings
Verified ML tasks are in principle computable
Computable analysis offers a unifying framework for ML verification
Model-agnostic approach broadens applicability of verification methods
Abstract
There is a strong consensus that combining the versatility of machine learning with the assurances given by formal verification is highly desirable. It is much less clear what verified machine learning should mean exactly. We consider this question from the (unexpected?) perspective of computable analysis. This allows us to define the computational tasks underlying verified ML in a model-agnostic way, and show that they are in principle computable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Scientific Computing and Data Management · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
