Amidst Uncertainty -- or Not? Decision-Making in Early-Stage Software Startups
Kai-Kristian Kemell, Eveliina Ventil\"a, Petri Kettunen, Tommi, Mikkonen

TL;DR
This study challenges the common belief that early-stage software startups operate in chaotic, uncertain environments by presenting an in-depth case study showing they do not experience unique uncertainty.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that early-stage software startups are not necessarily characterized by chaos or exceptional uncertainty, contrary to prior assumptions.
Findings
Startups do not operate in chaotic environments.
Early-stage startups face typical business uncertainties.
Empirical case study challenges existing beliefs.
Abstract
It is commonly claimed that the initial stages of any startup business are dominated by continuous, extended uncertainty, in an environment that has even been described as chaotic. Consequently, decisions are made in uncertain circumstances, so making the right decision is crucial to successful business. However, little currently exists in the way of empirical studies into this supposed uncertainty. In this paper, we study decision-making in early-stage software startups by means of a single, in-depth case study. Based on our data, we argue that software startups do not work in a chaotic environment, nor are they characterized by unique uncertainty unlike that experienced by other firms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
